Embry Riddle Aeronautical University Oracle Case Study Hello,Here are the instructions for this case study:There are several popular relational database management systems, including DB2, Oracle, Microsoft SQL Server and MySQL. Complete the following:Research two of these DBMS systems. Prepare a report (2-5 pages) that explains how each handles concurrent updates, data recovery and data access. Based upon your results, which database management system do
you recommend is utilized for the Colonial Adventure Tours Database?
Explain why.Refer to the Case Study Rubric for grading criteria.Grading Rubic:
MGMT 392 7.3 Case Study Rubric
MGMT 392 7.3 Case Study Rubric
Criteria
Ratings
Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Identification and Analysis of the Main Issues/Problem
25.0
pts
(Excellent
– A) Identifies and understands all of the main issues in the case
study. Insightful and thorough analysis of all the issues.
23.0
pts
(Above-Average
– B) Identifies and understands most of the main issues in the case
study. Thorough analysis of most of the issues.
21.0
pts
(Average
– C) Identifies and understands some of the issues in the case study.
Superficial analysis of some of the issues in the case.
19.0
pts
(Near-Failing – D) Identifies and understands few of the issues in case study. Incomplete analysis of the issues.
17.0
pts
(Failing – F) Identifies and understands very little of the issues in case study. No analysis of the issues.
25.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Answers to Case Study Questions
20.0
pts
(Excellent
– A) Answers to case study questions are clear throughout. Connection
with class and study material goes well beyond the obvious connections
among ideas; demonstrates insight and original thinking.
18.0
pts
(Above-Average
– B) Answers to case study questions present some irrelevant
information on topic etc., but very little; treatment goes beyond
obvious connections with class and study material.
16.0
pts
(Average – C) Answers to case study questions are vague in places; some irrelevant or distracting information.
14.0
pts
(Near-Failing
– D) Answers to case study questions are unclear and/or confusing.
Treatment is very superficial; paper may be well written but says
nothing.
12.0
pts
(Failing – F) Does not address the case study questions. Treatment is very superficial and says very little.
20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Comments on effective solutions/strategies
20.0
pts
(Excellent
– A) Well documented, reasoned, and pedagogically appropriate comments
on solutions, or proposals for solutions, to all issues in the case
study.
18.0
pts
(Above-Average
– B) Appropriate, well thought out comments about solutions, or
proposals for solutions, to most of the issues in the case study.
16.0
pts
(Average – C) Superficial and/or inappropriate solutions to some of the issues in the case study.
14.0
pts
(Near-Failing – D) Little or no action suggested, and/or inappropriate solutions to all of the issues in the case study.
12.0
pts
(Failing – F) Provided no feasible solutions or strategies to the issues in the case study.
20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Links to Course Readings and Additional Research
20.0
pts
(Excellent – A) Excellent research into the issues with clearly documented links to class (and/or outside) readings.
19.0
pts
Rating Description
18.0
pts
(Above-Average – B) Good research and documented links to the material read.
16.0
pts
(Average – C) Limited research and documented links to any readings.
14.0
pts
(Near-Failing – D) Incomplete research and links to any readings.
12.0
pts
(Failing – F) Provided no references or support of analysis.
20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Style and Mechanics
15.0
pts
(Excellent
– A) Chooses words for their precise meaning and uses an appropriate
level of specificity. Sentence style fits audience and purpose.
Sentences clearly structured and carefully focused. Almost entirely free
of spelling, punctuation, and grammatical errors.
12.0
pts
(Above-Average
– B) Generally uses words accurately and effectively, but may be too
general. Sentences generally clear, structured, and focused, though some
may be awkward or ineffective. May contain a few errors, which may
annoy the reader but not impede understanding.
10.0
pts
(Average
– C) Uses relatively vague and general words, may use some
inappropriate language. Sentence’s structure generally correct, but
sentences may be wordy, unfocused, repetitive, or confusing. Usually
contains several mechanical errors, which may temporarily confuse the
reader but not impede the overall understanding.
8.0
pts
(Near-Failing
– D) Tends to be vague and abstract, or very personal and specific.
Usually contains several awkward or ungrammatical sentences; sentence
structure is simple or monotonous. Usually contains either many
mechanical errors or a few important errors that block the reader’s
understanding and ability to see connections between thoughts.
6.0
pts
(Failing
– F) Misuse of words throughout. Awkward sentences throughout.
Difficult to attach a thought process. Poorly punctuated, misspelled
words, grammatically abusive.
15.0 pts
Total Points:
100.0