Metatheoretical Reflection Discussion Answer the discussion post below and response:
Meta-theory is a critical exploration of the theoretical frameworks or lenses that have provided direction to research and to researchers, as well as the theory that has arisen from research in a particular field of study. The following article adds insight on the topic:
Social behavior; investigators at free university describe findings in social behavior [What is behavior? and (when) is language behavior? A metatheoretical definition]. (2017). Psychology & Psychiatry Journal, 199.
Part 1: In the first week of this module, research an article to get the main idea of meta-theory in a theoretical framework and answer the following: Why did the researcher feel that this was an important topic? What three critical approaches are offered? What is the most important information in the article? In addition, at the end of the initial post, please pose an actual question or questions that occurred to you as you read the article.
Student Response:
Subject matter experts contend that audit research infrequently impacts practice, to a limited extent because of difficulties related with integrating and deciphering research. The researchers in the article suggests that utilizing the Elaboration Likelihood Model (ELM) as a meta-theoretical framework can assist in understanding the aggregate discoveries within judgment and decision-making research. One of the main objective will likely show the utility of the ELM by translating the outcomes of two examples of studies on subject participation and auditors’ temperaments. The blend of subject collaboration research proposes participation on a current issue influences auditors’ decisions just when auditors need inspiration to ponder the undertaking. Interestingly, a history filled with subject collaboration will in general influence bias even profoundly auditors’ decisions. The amalgamation of mood studies recommends motivational are important, however not adequate, to mitigate mood consequences for decisions.
Three critical approaches in the study is were the elements to the ELM framework, more specifically, the input variables, core mechanisms, and attitude. Without these critical components, the studies that were analyzed demonstrated that certain moods from researchers can in fact cause them to side with their subjects which may present bias. Also, the ELM framework has the ability to establish an acumen that about how a similar independent variables (subject cooperation or state of mind) can connect with various psychological components relying upon the other input variables present.
The question that comes to mind during the review of this article, how is one to explain different studies that utilize the same independent variable but provide conflicting data?
References:
Griffith, E. E., Nolder, C. J., & Petty, R. E. (2018). The elaboration likelihood model: A meta-theory for synthesizing auditor judgment and decision-making research. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 37(4), 169-186.