ADM614 Grand Canyon Economic Growth and Market Dynamics Presentation eate a PowerPoint presentation of 12-15 slides (title and reference slides are not including in this count) discussing Economic Growth and Market Dynamics. Include the following:
Explain what GDP is and how is it measured.
Evaluate the validity of using GDP as a measure of economic output.
Assess the validity of using GDP as a measure of social progress. Which elements (e.g., education levels, carbon dioxide emissions, gender/racial inequality) does GDP not consider?
Identify and describe two alternative (multidimensional) metrics that take into consideration more than the exchange value of economic output. Do those metrics capture social progress/well-being? Explain.
Explain if public officials focus exclusively—or even principally—on economic growth as a measure of economic policy success. Which other factors are also salient? Why?
Be sure to include graphs, charts and other visuals in your presentation that will enhance your analysis. Include speaker notes below each content-related slide that represent what would be said if giving the presentation in person. Expand upon the information included in the slide and do not simply restate it. Please ensure the speaker notes include 50-75 words per slide.
While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, including an APA formatted reference slide, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance. Course Code
ADM-614
Class Code
ADM-614-O500
Criteria
Criteria
Percentage
100.0%
Explain what GDP is and how it is measured.
15.0%
Evaluate the validity of using GDP as a measure
of economic output.
15.0%
Assess the validity of using GDP as a measure of
social progress. Which elements (e.g., education
levels, carbon dioxide emissions, gender/racial
inequality) does GDP not consider?
15.0%
Identify and describe two alternative
(multidimensional) metrics that take into
consideration more than the exchange value of
economic output. Do those metrics capture
social progress/well-being? Explain.
15.0%
Explain if public officials focus exclusively—or
even principally—on economic growth as a
measure of economic policy success. Which
other factors are also salient? Why
10.0%
Presentation of Content
15.0%
Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes
sentence construction, word choice, etc.)
5.0%
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling,
punctuation, grammar, language use)
5.0%
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes,
references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to
assignment and style)
5.0%
Total Weightage
100%
Assignment Title
Economic Growth and Alternative Metrics
Unsatisfactory (0.00%)
Explanation of what GDP is and how it is measured is missing.
Evaluation of the validity of using GDP as a measure of
economic output is missing.
Assessment of the validity of using GDP as a measure of social
progress is missing.
Identification and description of two alternative metrics that
take into consideration more than the exchange value of
economic output is missing.
Explanation of whether public officials focus exclusively on
economic growth as a measure of economic policy success is
missing.
The content lacks a clear point of view and logical sequence
of information. Includes little persuasive information.
Sequencing of ideas is unclear.
Inappropriate word choice and lack of variety in language use
are evident. Writer appears to be unaware of audience. Use
of primer prose indicates writer either does not apply figures
of speech or uses them inappropriately.
Slide errors are pervasive enough that they impede
communication of meaning.
Sources are not documented.
Total Points
120.0
Less Than Satisfactory (74.00%)
Explanation of what GDP is and how it is measured is vague
and inconsistent.
Evaluation of the validity of using GDP as a measure of
economic output is vague and inconsistent.
Assessment of the validity of using GDP as a measure of social
progress is vague and inconsistent.
Identification and description of two alternative metrics that
take into consideration more than the exchange value of
economic output is vague and inconsistent.
Explanation of whether public officials focus exclusively on
economic growth as a measure of economic policy success is
vague and inconsistent.
The content is vague in conveying a point of view and does
not create a strong sense of purpose. Includes some
persuasive information.
Some distracting inconsistencies in language choice (register)
or word choice are present. The writer exhibits some lack of
control in using figures of speech appropriately.
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the
reader.
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as
appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous
formatting errors.
Satisfactory (79.00%)
Explanation of what GDP is and how it is measured is present.
Evaluation of the validity of using GDP as a measure of
economic output is present.
Assessment of the validity of using GDP as a measure of social
progress is present and includes elements the GDP does not
consider.
Identification and description of two alternative metrics that
take into consideration more than the exchange value of
economic output is present and includes an explanation of
whether those metrics capture social progress/well-being.
Explanation of whether public officials focus exclusively on
economic growth as a measure of economic policy success is
present and includes other salient factors.
The presentation slides are generally competent, but ideas
may show some inconsistency in organization or in their
relationships to each other.
Language is appropriate to the targeted audience for the
most part.
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are
not overly distracting to the reader.
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and
style, although some formatting errors may be present.
Good (87.00%)
Explanation of what GDP is and how it is measured is present,
clear, and supported by some research.
Evaluation of the validity of using GDP as a measure of
economic output is present and clear.
Assessment of the validity of using GDP as a measure of social
progress is present, clear, and includes elements the GDP
does not consider.
Identification and description of two alternative metrics that
take into consideration more than the exchange value of
economic output is present, clear, and includes an
explanation of whether those metrics capture social
progress/well-being.
Explanation of whether public officials focus exclusively on
economic growth as a measure of economic policy success is
present, clear, and includes other salient factors.
The content is written with a logical progression of ideas and
supporting information exhibiting a unity, coherence, and
cohesiveness. Includes persuasive information from reliable
sources.
The writer is clearly aware of audience, uses a variety of
appropriate vocabulary for the targeted audience, and uses
figures of speech to communicate clearly.
Slides are largely free of mechanical errors, although a few
may be present.
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and
style, and format is mostly correct.
Excellent (100.00%)
Explanation of what GDP is and how it is measured is clear,
concise, and supported by current research.
Evaluation of the validity of using GDP as a measure of
economic output is clear and concise.
Assessment of the validity of using GDP as a measure of social
progress is clear, concise, and includes elements the GDP
does not consider supported with current research.
Identification and description of two alternative metrics that
take into consideration more than the exchange value of
economic output is clear, concise, and includes a scholarly
explanation of whether those metrics capture social
progress/well-being.
Explanation of whether public officials focus exclusively on
economic growth as a measure of economic policy success is
clear, concise, and includes other salient factors supported by
research.
The content is written clearly and concisely. Ideas universally
progress and relate to each other. The project includes
motivating questions and advanced organizers. The project
gives the audience a clear sense of the main idea.
Comments
The writer uses a variety of sentence constructions, figures of
speech, and word choice in distinctive and creative ways that
are appropriate to purpose, discipline, and scope.
Writer is clearly in control of standard, written, academic
English.
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as
appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of
error.
Points Earned
Purchase answer to see full
attachment