ECN500 Saudi Electronic University Factor Endowment Theory Essay Dears,
Kindly follow the follow the instruction on the Rubric attached, You will find all the questions on the Word file.
Course: ECN-500: Global Economics
Regards
Abdulaziz Alhamidi
+966540800093 Global Economics
Critical Thinking: Factor Endowment Theory (100 points)
In a critical essay, you will select a country of your choice and will compare your chosen country to
KSA in relation to the factor endowment theory. For each country, discuss:
1.
What is the impact of resource endowments on comparative advantage?
2.
Is the factor-endowment theory a good predictor of trade patterns?
3.
What additional trade theories can be applied? Explain their main insights and challenges. As one of
the trade initiatives in KSA, assess the aims of Saudi Vision 2030 in relation to factor endowment
theory.
Directions:
•
•
•
•
•
Your essay is required to be four to five pages in length, which does not include the title page and
reference pages, which are never a part of the content minimum requirements.
Support your submission with course material concepts, principles, and theories from the textbook
and at least three scholarly, peer-reviewed journal articles. Use the Saudi Digital Library to find your
resources.
Use Saudi Electronic University academic writing standards and follow APA style guidelines.
It is strongly encouraged that you submit all assignments into Turnitin prior to submitting them to
your instructor for grading. If you are unsure how to submit an assignment into the Originality Check
tool, review the Turnitin – Student Guide for step-by-step instructions.
Review the grading rubric to see how you will be graded for this assignment.
ECN500
Critical Thinking Writing Rubric – Module 3
Exceeds
Expectation
Content, Research, and Analysis
21-25 Points
Requirements
Exceeds
Expectation Includes all of the
required
components, as
specified in the
assignment.
21-25 Points
Content
Exceeds
Expectation Demonstrates
substantial and
extensive
knowledge of the
materials, with no
errors or major
omissions.
25-30 Points
Analysis
Exceeds
Expectation Provides strong
thought, insight,
and analysis of
concepts and
applications.
13-15 Points
Sources
Exceeds
Expectation Sources go above
and beyond
required criteria,
and are well
chosen to provide
effective
substance and
perspectives on
the issue under
examination.
Meets Expectation
Below Expectation
Limited Evidence
16-20 Points
Meets Expectation
– Includes most of
the required
components, as
specified in the
assignment.
11-15 Points
Below Expectation
– Includes some of
the required
components, as
specified in the
assignment.
6-10 Points
Limited Evidence Includes few of the
required
components, as
specified in the
assignment.
16-20 Points
Meets Expectation
– Demonstrates
adequate
knowledge of the
materials; may
include some
minor errors or
omissions.
11-15 Points
Below Expectation
– Demonstrates fair
knowledge of the
materials and/or
includes some
major errors or
omissions.
6-10 Points
Limited Evidence Fails to
demonstrate
knowledge of the
materials and/or
includes many
major errors or
omissions.
19-24 Points
Meets Expectation
– Provides
adequate thought,
insight, and
analysis of
concepts and
applications.
10-12 Points
Meets Expectation
– Sources meet
required criteria
and are adequately
chosen to provide
substance and
perspectives on the
issue under
examination.
13-18 Points
Below Expectation
– Provides poor
thought, insight,
and analysis of
concepts and
applications.
7-12 Points
Limited Evidence Provides little or no
thought, insight,
and analysis of
concepts and
applications.
7-9 Points
Below Expectation
– Sources meet
required criteria,
but are poorly
chosen to provide
substance and
perspectives on the
issue under
examination.
4-6 Points
Limited Evidence Source selection
and integration of
knowledge from
the course is
clearly deficient.
ECN500
Critical Thinking Writing Rubric – Module 3
Mechanics and Writing
Demonstrates
college-level
proficiency in
organization,
grammar and
style.
5 Points
Exceeds
Expectation Project is clearly
organized, well
written, and in
proper format as
outlined in the
assignment. Strong
sentence and
paragraph
structure; contains
no errors in
grammar, spelling,
APA style, or APA
citations and
references.
Total points possible = 100
4 Points
Meets Expectation
– Project is fairly
well organized and
written, and is in
proper format as
outlined in the
assignment.
Reasonably good
sentence and
paragraph
structure; may
include a few
minor errors in
grammar, spelling,
APA style, or APA
citations and
references.
3 Points
Below Expectation
– Project is poorly
organized and
written, and may
not follow proper
format as outlined
in the assignment.
Inconsistent to
inadequate
sentence and
paragraph
development,
and/or includes
numerous or major
errors in grammar,
spelling, APA style,
or APA citations
and references.
1-2 Points
Limited Evidence Project is not
organized or well
written, and is not
in proper format as
outlined in the
assignment. Poor
quality work;
unacceptable in
terms of grammar,
spelling, APA style,
and APA citations
and references.
Purchase answer to see full
attachment