MGT560 Saudi Electronic Global Leadership Behaviors Research Paper GLOBE research identified six global leadership behaviors that are considered important

MGT560 Saudi Electronic Global Leadership Behaviors Research Paper GLOBE research identified six global leadership behaviors that are considered important in various cultures in varying degrees: Charismatic/value-basedTeam orientedParticipativeHuman orientedAutonomousSelf or group protective. the workplace is becoming more global in nature. It is important for leaders to understand and
manage these differences in workplace culture and diversity. GLOBE research identified six global
leadership behaviors that are considered important in various cultures in varying degrees:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Charismatic/value-based
Team oriented
Participative
Human oriented
Autonomous
Self or group protective.
Explain what each of the six terms means in terms of leadership behaviors. Choose one of the
following cultures: Anglo, Latin American, or Confucian Asian and explain the similarities and
differences to leadership behaviors in the culture of Saudi Arabia.
As a manager with an employee from each of those cultures (Anglo, Latin American, or Confucian
Asian), explain how you might change your leadership style, or support your reasoning for expecting
the employee to change behaviors to work within the Saudi Arabian culture.
Directions:

Write an essay that includes an introduction paragraph, the essay’s body, and a conclusion paragraph
to address the assignment’s guide questions. Do not address the questions using a question-andanswer format.
Your well-written paper should meet the following requirements:

Be 3-5 pages in length, which does not include the title and reference pages, which are never a part of
the content minimum requirements.
Use Saudi Electronic University academic writing standards and APA style guidelines.
Support your submission with course material concepts, principles, and theories from the textbook
and at least two current, scholarly, peer-reviewed journal articles. Current articles are those published
in the last five years.
It is strongly encouraged that you submit all assignments to the Turnitin Originality Check prior to
submitting it to your instructor for grading. If you are unsure how to submit an assignment to the
Originality Check tool, review the Turnitin Originality Check–Student Guide for step-by-step
instructions.
In advance of submission, review the grading rubric to see how you will be graded for this
assignment.




SEU_MGT560
Critical Thinking Writing Rubric – Module 2
Exceeds
Expectation
Content, Research, and Analysis
21-25 Points
Requirements
Includes all of the
required
components, as
specified in the
assignment.
21-25 Points
Content
Demonstrates
substantial and
extensive
knowledge of the
materials, with no
errors or major
omissions.
25-30 Points
Analysis
Provides strong
thought, insight,
and analysis of
concepts and
applications.
9-10 Points
Sources
Sources include
more than two
scholarly, peerreviewed journal
articles, which are
well chosen to
provide effective
substance and
perspectives on
the issue under
examination.
Mechanics and Writing
9-10 Points
Demonstrates
Project is clearly
college-level
organized, well
proficiency in
written, and in
organization,
proper format as
grammar and
outlined in the
style.
assignment.
Strong sentence
and paragraph
structure, contains
no errors in
Meets Expectation
Below Expectation
16-20 Points
Includes most of
the required
components, as
specified in the
assignment.
16-20 Points
Demonstrates
adequate
knowledge of the
materials; may
include some
minor errors or
omissions.
19-24 Points
Provides adequate
thought, insight,
and analysis of
concepts and
applications.
7-8 Points
Sources include
two scholarly,
peer-reviewed
journal articles,
which are
adequately chosen
to provide
substance and
perspectives on the
issue under
examination.
11-15 Points
Includes some of
the required
components, as
specified in the
assignment.
11-15 Points
Demonstrates fair
knowledge of the
materials and/or
includes some
major errors or
omissions.
7-8 Points
Project is fairly well
organized and
written and is in
proper format as
outlined in the
assignment.
Reasonably good
sentence and
paragraph
structure, may
5-6 Points
Project is poorly
organized and
written and may
not follow proper
format as outlined
in the assignment.
Inconsistent to
inadequate
sentence and
paragraph
13-18 Points
Provides poor
though, insight,
and analysis of
concepts and
applications.
5-6 Points
Source includes
one scholarly,
peer-reviewed
journal article,
which provides
minimal substance
and perspectives
on the issue under
examination.
Limited Evidence
6-10 Points
Includes few of the
required
components, as
specified in the
assignment.
6-11 Points
Fails to
demonstrate
knowledge of the
materials and/or
includes many
major errors or
omissions.
7-12 Points
Provides little or no
thought, insight,
and analysis of
concepts and
applications.
3-4 Points
Source selection
and integration of
knowledge from
the course is
clearly deficient.
3-4 Points
Project is not
organized or well
written and is not
in proper format as
outlined in the
assignment. Poor
quality work;
unacceptable in
terms of grammar,
spelling, APA style,
SEU_MGT560
Critical Thinking Writing Rubric – Module 2
grammar, spelling,
APA style, or APA
citations and
references.
Total points possible = 100
include a few
minor errors in
grammar, spelling,
APA style, or APA
citations and
references.
development,
and/or includes
numerous or major
errors in grammar,
spelling, APA style
or APA citations
and references.
and APA citations
and references.

Purchase answer to see full
attachment