Saint Petersburg College Moduel 5 and 6 Worksheets Instructions module 5
Submit the completed Methods Exercise Worksheet, Evaluation Planning Questionnaire Worksheet, Methods Statement, and Evaluation Statement. (Be sure to submit all four attachments at the same time in one submission)
There will be FOUR (4) separate documents due for this assignment (2 worksheets and 2 narrative submissions):
The Methods Worksheet (page 53)
A written Methods Component for the Grant Proposal (narrative document, see page 52 for example)
The Evaluation Planning Questionnaire (pages 61-62)
A written Evaluation Component for the Grant Proposal (narrative document, see page 60 for example).
Worksheet 5.1a1.docx
Worksheet 6.1a1.docx
Instructions module 6
Submit both the worksheet and the budget narrative in the dropbox. Make sure you submit both attachments in the same submission.
This is a two-part assignment: 1) Complete the Budget worksheet and 2) Submit along with the budget narrative a detailed narrative that explains and justifies the costs and expenses of the grant.
Worksheet 8.1a.docx WORKSHEET 5.1A:
Methods Exercise
Use the filled-out Worksheet 5.1B in the book as an example to follow as you perform this
exercise.
Tasks and
Subtasks
Person(s)
Responsible
Resources
Needed
Start and Finish
Dates
Insert text in shaded
text boxes
Winning Grants Step by Step, Third Edition. Copyright © 2008 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved.
WORKSHEET 6.1A:
Evaluation Planning Questionnaire
Use the filled-out Worksheet 6.1B in the book as an example to follow as you complete this
questionnaire.
1. What questions will your organization’s evaluation activities seek to answer?
2. What are the specific evaluation plans and time frames?
a. What kinds of data will be collected?
b. At what points?
c. Using what strategies or instruments?
d. Using what comparison group or baseline, if any?
(Continued)
Winning Grants Step by Step, Third Edition. Copyright © 2008 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved.
WORKSHEET 6.1A:
Evaluation Planning Questionnaire
(Continued)
3. If you intend to study a sample of participants, how will this sample be constructed?
4. What procedures will you use to determine whether the program was implemented
as planned?
5. Who will conduct the evaluation?
6. Who will receive the results?
7. How are you defining success for this program or project?
Winning Grants Step by Step, Third Edition. Copyright © 2008 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved.
WORKSHEET 8.1A:
Revenue and Expense Budget
Use the filled-out Worksheet 8.1B in the book as an example as you complete this worksheet.
CASH REQUIRED
REVENUE
Foundations
Government
Corporations
Individual contributions
Donated printing
and supplies
Volunteer services
Other (specify):
Total revenue
EXPENSES
Salaries (prorated if less
than full time)
List positions here
Payroll taxes and benefits
(percentage of salaries)
Bookkeeping contractor
Other (specify):
Total personnel
Office rent (% for program)
Supplies
Printing
Utilities
Telephone
Copy services
Postage
Travel
Membership dues
Other (specify):
Total nonpersonnel
Total expenses
Click to the right of
$ to type amount
$
IN-KIND
CONTRIBUTIONS
Click to the right of
$ to type amount
$
TOTAL BUDGET
Click to the right of $
to type amount
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
Total revenue $
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
Total Expenses $
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
Winning Grants Step by Step, Third Edition. Copyright © 2008 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved.
Winning Grants Step by Step, Third Edition. Copyright © 2008 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved.
organization can come up
design
that incorporates both quantitative and qualitative methods.
Take a look at the Sample Evaluation Component prepared for the
Swim 4 Life program:
Sample Evaluation Component
Evaluation of age groups at RLC and after school programs at Arthur Schomberg and Cooperville
will offer opportunities to measure long term outcomes. Staff will measure student performance
by improvement in times for each stroke at various distances. Medical professionals from Any City
University Hospital and educators from Some City College and Everytown University will assist
in formulating an evaluation construct measuring changes in physical fitness (flexibility, aerobic
endurance, and weight) and academic performance (attendance, drop-out rates, grades, and interest
in going to college). Resulting data will be disseminated to the school administrators and district,
reported to other stakeholders-including the XYZ Foundation if this request is approved-and used
to continually improve the program. Expected long-term outcomes include increased scores on state
mandated fitness tests performed in students’ physical education classes.
To evaluate the overall effectiveness of the Swim 4 Life program at its three sites, we will have our
instructors use pretest and posttest assessments, in addition to direct observation of students in the
water so that baseline performance can be determined for all participants. Children’s progress in
the Learn-to-Swim Program is evaluated based on effort made and skills achieved as evidenced by
participants holding their breath under water, ability to dog paddle from the middle of the pool to
the side of the pool, and ability to tread water for a minimum of one minute. The assessment process
also tracks changes in attitude toward swimming as evidenced by qualitative written storytelling from
a minimum of 25 percent of program participants. In addition, instructors will administer a multiple
choice exam on water safety at the end of each four-week session. After the first six months of program
implementation, the goal is to have participants answer an average of 75 percent of the questions
correctly. School administrators, teachers, and parents will be sought for qualitative feedback on a scale
of 1-100 percent relative to their satisfaction with the program and to influence its implementation
strategies, administrative processes, and related activities. For those students with IEPs, we will conduct
a parent satisfaction survey with the goal of showing a minimum 85 percent favorability rating of the
program.
Answer the questions in Worksheet 6.1 to begin planning the evaluation
section. When completing the evaluation section, review it with the Evalu-
ation Review Questions.
organization can come up
design
that incorporates both quantitative and qualitative methods.
Take a look at the Sample Evaluation Component prepared for the
Swim 4 Life program:
Sample Evaluation Component
Evaluation of age groups at RLC and after school programs at Arthur Schomberg and Cooperville
will offer opportunities to measure long term outcomes. Staff will measure student performance
by improvement in times for each stroke at various distances. Medical professionals from Any City
University Hospital and educators from Some City College and Everytown University will assist
in formulating an evaluation construct measuring changes in physical fitness (flexibility, aerobic
endurance, and weight) and academic performance (attendance, drop-out rates, grades, and interest
in going to college). Resulting data will be disseminated to the school administrators and district,
reported to other stakeholders-including the XYZ Foundation if this request is approved-and used
to continually improve the program. Expected long-term outcomes include increased scores on state
mandated fitness tests performed in students’ physical education classes.
To evaluate the overall effectiveness of the Swim 4 Life program at its three sites, we will have our
instructors use pretest and posttest assessments, in addition to direct observation of students in the
water so that baseline performance can be determined for all participants. Children’s progress in
the Learn-to-Swim Program is evaluated based on effort made and skills achieved as evidenced by
participants holding their breath under water, ability to dog paddle from the middle of the pool to
the side of the pool, and ability to tread water for a minimum of one minute. The assessment process
also tracks changes in attitude toward swimming as evidenced by qualitative written storytelling from
a minimum of 25 percent of program participants. In addition, instructors will administer a multiple
choice exam on water safety at the end of each four-week session. After the first six months of program
implementation, the goal is to have participants answer an average of 75 percent of the questions
correctly. School administrators, teachers, and parents will be sought for qualitative feedback on a scale
of 1-100 percent relative to their satisfaction with the program and to influence its implementation
strategies, administrative processes, and related activities. For those students with IEPs, we will conduct
a parent satisfaction survey with the goal of showing a minimum 85 percent favorability rating of the
program.
Answer the questions in Worksheet 6.1 to begin planning the evaluation
section. When completing the evaluation section, review it with the Evalu-
ation Review Questions.
Purchase answer to see full
attachment