SFTY619 Embry Riddle Aeronautical Warning Intervention Gasoline Proposal Submit your assignment, which required you to design a warning initiative or inter

SFTY619 Embry Riddle Aeronautical Warning Intervention Gasoline Proposal Submit your assignment, which required you to design a warning initiative or intervention as a means to enhance safety to curtail injuries and/or illnesses. This assignment is due by the end of this module. The assignment should be submitted in APA format. Any graphics, figures, etc. should be included as Appendices. See the grading rubric prior to submission of your assignment.

You will need to select a particular product, chemical, hazard, task, etc. that you want to address within your workplace. If you are unable to perform this task in a workplace, select a product, chemical, hazard, task that is applicable to a specific population (gasoline – general public, radon – homeowners, magnets – parents of young children, etc.).

You will use the C-HIP Model to develop your warning initiative or intervention. You must provide details for each aspect of the model. You must detail the intervention or initiative that you intend to develop and you must provide justification. This should be done for all aspects of the model. Thus, you should discuss and justify the source of the risk information and you should detail the media and channel as to how the warning will be presented and why (justify). You need to address all aspects of the receiver. In your justification be sure to incorporate theoretical concepts and principles from the content learned in the module associated with sensation, perception, and information processing. Lastly, discuss the intended behavior that should be produced from the initiative or intervention.

After this information is presented, you should detail a strategy as to how you plan to evaluate your initiative or intervention. You should address process evaluation, impact evaluation, and outcome evaluation within your evaluation plan (this may require some additional research as to what should be included in these evaluation measures). The following sources will provide guidance as to definitions for the types of evaluations and items that need to be assessed in each aspect of the evaluation.

Evaluation (Links to an external site.)
Framework for Program Evaluation in Public Health (Links to an external site.)
Program Evaluation (CDC) (Links to an external site.)
– Please Note: Be sure to access the links to the left of the CDC page including: Framework, Steps, Standards, etc.

SFTY 619 3.3 – C-HIP Applied Activity Rubric

SFTY 619 3.3 – C-HIP Applied Activity Rubric

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFormattingThis assignment should be presented in APA format. Citations should be made in the text and the paper should include all references. The paper can contain bulleted items, figures, and tables. These should be formatted according to APA format. This section is worth 10 points.

10.0 pts

Excellent (8-10) | The student always followed APA format and appropriately cited work and provided references. Very few, if any, grammatical errors and mistakes.

7.0 pts

Average (5-7) | The student usually followed APA format and usually properly cited work and provided references. Few grammatical errors and mistakes.

4.0 pts

Below Average (3-4) | The student sometimes followed APA format and did not always properly cite work and/or provide adequate references. Grammatical errors and mistakes were common.

2.0 pts

Poor (0-2) | The student failed to follow APA format, did not include citations and references. Frequent grammatical errors.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeUse of C-HIP ModelThe student will use the C-HIP Model to develop a warning initiative or intervention for a particular product, chemical, hazard, etc. they want to address. The student must provide details for each aspect of the C-HIP model. The intervention or initiative must be detailed and a justification presented. This should be done for all aspects of the model. Thus, the student should discuss and justify the source of the risk information, should detail the media and channel as to how the warning will be presented and why (justify). The student will also need to address all aspects of the receiver. The justification should incorporate theoretical concepts and principles from the content learned in the module associated with sensation, perception and information processing. Lastly, the student should discuss the intended behavior that should be produced from the initiative or intervention.

45.0 pts

Excellent (41-45) | The student developed an excellent warning initiative or intervention. It was thorough, detailed and exceeded expectations. All aspects of the C-HIP were thoroughly addressed. A detailed and thorough justification was provided. The justification fully incorporated theoretical concepts and principles. The student thoroughly presented the intended behavioral consequences.

40.0 pts

Average (34-40) | The student developed a satisfactory warning initiative or intervention. It was moderately detailed and exceeded most expectations. All aspects of the C-HIP were addressed. A satisfactory justification was provided. The justification for the most part incorporated theoretical concepts and principles. The student satisfactorily presented the intended behavioral consequences.

33.0 pts

Below Average (29-33) | The student developed a marginal warning initiative or intervention. It lacked detail and did not fully meet expectations. Most of the aspects of the C-HIP were addressed, but details were lacking. The justification minimally incorporated theoretical concepts and principles. The student minimally presented the intended behavioral consequences.

28.0 pts

Poor (0-28) | The student failed to develop or developed a poor warning initiative or intervention. It lacked details and failed to meet expectations. Only some of the aspects of the C-HIP were addressed. Details were lacking. The justification failed to include theoretical concepts and principles. The student minimally or failed to present the intended behavioral consequences.

45.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeStrategyThe student should detail a strategy as to how he/she plans to evaluate the initiative or intervention. The strategy should address process evaluation, impact evaluation and outcome evaluation within the evaluation plan. Students will likely need to research this topic more in depth to develop an satisfactory plan or strategy. The assignment provides sources for information that can be accessed to assist in developing your evaluation plan or strategy.

45.0 pts

Excellent (41-45) | The student developed an excellent intervention plan/strategy. It was thorough, detailed and exceeded expectations. All forms of evaluation were included. The strategy if carried out will provide useful results.

40.0 pts

Average (34-40) | The student developed a satisfactory intervention plan/strategy. It was well presented and meets expectations, but lacks the detail and sophistication of an excellent plan. All forms of evaluation were included. The strategy if carried out will likely provide useful results.

33.0 pts

Below Average (29-33) | The student developed a deficient intervention plan/strategy. It lacked details, was not well presented and did not fully meet expectations. All forms of evaluation were not included. The strategy if carried out may not provide useful results.

28.0 pts

Poor (0-28) | The student failed to develop an evaluation plan or the plan was poorly designed. The plan was also poorly presented, indicating the student failed to understand the necessary components and aspects of an evaluation. None or only portions of the various forms of evaluation were included. The strategy if carried out will not provide useful results.

45.0 pts

Total Points: 100.0