Uncategorized

ADM624 Grand Canyon Public Ethical and Social Responsibility Discussion You will assume the role of a public administrator to complete this assignment. Cho

ADM624 Grand Canyon Public Ethical and Social Responsibility Discussion You will assume the role of a public administrator to complete this assignment. Choose an administrator role; some examples are below:

Police Chief
Finance Officer
Urban Planner
City Manager
FBI Director

As the public administrator, in the role you choose, in 750-1,000 words do the following:

Describe how social responsibility and public interest intersect.
Analyze your responsibility to stakeholder from an ethical standpoint. Describe how a code of ethics or oath of office for the position you choose informs your ethical responsibilities
Describe how you will make the decisions necessary to ethically execute your position as a public administrator in the role you choose.
Create a suggested code of ethics or add to an existing code of ethics for the administrative role chosen.
Explain why it is essential for you, in this role, to conduct yourself in a legal and ethical manner. How would your failure to conduct yourself in an ethical manner affect various stakeholders you are responsible for?

Use three to five scholarly resources to support your explanations.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.

This benchmark assignment assesses the following programmatic competencies: 1.1 Analyze why it is essential for public servants to conduct themselves in a legal and ethical manner with various stakeholders. Course Code
ADM-624
Class Code
ADM-624-O500
Criteria
Content
Percentage
70.0%
Describe how social responsibility and public
interest intersect.
15.0%
Analyze the responsibility to stakeholders from
an ethical standpoint. Include how a code of
ethics or oath of office for the position informs
ethical responsibilities.
15.0%
Describe how you will make the decisions
necessary to ethically execute your position as a
public administrative role chosen.
15.0%
Create a suggested code of ethics or add to an
existing code of ethics for the administrative role
chosen.
10.0%
Explain why it is essential for you, in this role, to
conduct yourself in a legal and ethical manner,
including how failure to conduct yourself in an
ethical manner affects various stakeholders.
(Comp 1.1)
15.0%
Organization and Effectiveness
20.0%
Thesis Development and Purpose
7.0%
Argument Logic and Construction
8.0%
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling,
punctuation, grammar, language use)
5.0%
Format
10.0%
Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the
major and assignment)
5.0%
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes,
references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to
assignment and style)
5.0%
Total Weightage
100%
Assignment Title
Benchmark – Ethical Responsibility
Unsatisfactory (0.00%)
Description of how social responsibility and public interest
intersect is missing.
Analysis of the responsibility to stakeholders from an ethical
standpoint. Include how a code of ethics or oath of office for
the position informs ethical responsibilities is missing.
Description of how you will make the decisions necessary to
ethically execute your position as a public administrative role
chosen is missing.
Creation of a suggested code of ethics or add to an existing
code of ethics for the administrative role chosen is missing.
Explanation of why it is essential for the student, in this role,
to conduct yourself in a legal and ethical manner; including
how failure to conduct self in an ethical manner affects
various stakeholders is missing.
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing
claim.
Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The
conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is
incoherent and uses noncredible sources.
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede
communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or
sentence construction is used.
Template is not used appropriately or documentation format
is rarely followed correctly.
Sources are not documented.
Total Points
130.0
Less than Satisfactory (74.00%)
Description of how social responsibility and public interest
intersect is vague and inconsistent.
Analysis of the responsibility to stakeholders from an ethical
standpoint. Include how a code of ethics or oath of office for
the position informs ethical responsibilities is vague and
inconsistent.
Description of how you will make the decisions necessary to
ethically execute your position as a public administrative role
chosen is vague and inconsistent.
Creation of a suggested code of ethics or add to an existing
code of ethics for the administrative role chosen is vague and
inconsistent.
Explanation of why it is essential for the student, in this role,
to conduct yourself in a legal and ethical manner; including
how failure to conduct self in an ethical manner affects
various stakeholders is vague and inconsistent.
Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not
clear.
Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks
consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some
sources have questionable credibility.
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the
reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word
choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not
varied.
Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing
or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as
appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous
formatting errors.
Satisfactory (79.00%)
Description of how social responsibility and public interest
intersect is present and complete.
Analysis of the responsibility to stakeholders from an ethical
standpoint. Include how a code of ethics or oath of office for
the position informs ethical responsibilities is present and
complete.
Description of how you will make the decisions necessary to
ethically execute your position as a public administrative role
chosen is present and complete.
Creation of a suggested code of ethics or add to an existing
code of ethics for the administrative role chosen is present
and complete.
Explanation of why it is essential for the student, in this role,
to conduct yourself in a legal and ethical manner; including
how failure to conduct self in an ethical manner affects
various stakeholders is present and complete.
Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.
Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The
argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument
logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources
used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the
thesis.
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are
not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied
sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are
employed.
Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although
some minor errors may be present.
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and
style, although some formatting errors may be present.
Good (87.00%)
Description of how social responsibility and public interest
intersect is complete and clear.
Analysis of the responsibility to stakeholders from an ethical
standpoint. Include how a code of ethics or oath of office for
the position informs ethical responsibilities is complete and
clear.
Description of how you will make the decisions necessary to
ethically execute your position as a public administrative role
chosen is complete and clear.
Creation of a suggested code of ethics or add to an existing
code of ethics for the administrative role chosen is complete
and clear.
Explanation of why it is essential for the student, in this role,
to conduct yourself in a legal and ethical manner; including
how failure to conduct self in an ethical manner affects
various stakeholders is complete and clear.
Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper.
Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and
appropriate to the purpose.
Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of
argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of
claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are
authoritative.
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may
be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence
structures and figures of speech.
Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no
errors in formatting style.
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and
style, and format is mostly correct.
Excellent (100.00%)
Description of how social responsibility and public interest
intersect is clear, concise, and makes connections to current
research.
Analysis of the responsibility to stakeholders from an ethical
standpoint. Include how a code of ethics or oath of office for
the position informs ethical responsibilities is clear, concise,
and makes connections to current research.
Description of how you will make the decisions necessary to
ethically execute your position as a public administrative role
chosen is clear, concise, and makes connections to current
research.
Creation of a suggested code of ethics or add to an existing
code of ethics for the administrative role chosen is clear,
concise, and makes connections to current research.
Explanation of why it is essential for the student, in this role,
to conduct yourself in a legal and ethical manner; including
how failure to conduct self in an ethical manner affects
various stakeholders is clear, concise, and makes connections
to current research.
Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the
paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper
clear.
Comments
Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive
claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are
authoritative.
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic
English.
All format elements are correct.
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as
appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of
error.
Points Earned

Purchase answer to see full
attachment