CJ 550 Southern New Hampshire University Communicating Through Training Analysis Reflect on any personal or professional experience you have had where training was used to communicate a new policy or procedure.How effective did you feel this method of communication and/or training was?What were some of the positive aspects of the training?In response to your peers, reflect on whether you agree with your peers’ thoughts on the positive aspects of training. If the training experience they shared was ineffective, offer suggestions that could have improved the training.To complete this assignment, review the Discussion Rubric document. Discussion Rubric: Graduate
Your active participation in the discussion forums is essential to your overall success this term. Discussion questions are designed to help you make meaningful
connections between the course content and the larger concepts and goals of the course. These discussions offer you the opportunity to express your own
thoughts, ask questions for clarification, and gain insight from your classmates’ responses and instructor’s guidance.
Requirements for Discussion Board Assignments
Students are required to post one initial post and to follow up with at least two response posts for each discussion board assignment.
For your initial post (1), you must do the following:
Compose a post of one to two paragraphs.
In Module One, complete the initial post by Thursday at 11:59 p.m.
Eastern Time.
In Modules Two through Ten, complete the initial post by Thursday at
11:59 p.m. of your local time zone.
Take into consideration material such as course content and other
discussion boards from the current module and previous modules, when
appropriate.
Reference scholarly or peer-reviewed sources to support your discussion
points, as appropriate (using proper citation methods for your discipline).
Critical Elements
Comprehension
Exemplary
Develops an initial post with an
organized, clear point of view or
idea using rich and significant
detail (100%)
Timeliness
Engagement
Critical Thinking
Provides relevant and
meaningful response posts with
clarifying explanation and detail
(100%)
Draws insightful conclusions that
are thoroughly defended with
evidence and examples (100%)
Proficient
Develops an initial post with a
point of view or idea using
appropriate detail (90%)
Submits initial post on time
(100%)
Provides relevant response posts
with some explanation and
detail (90%)
Draws informed conclusions that
are justified with evidence (90%)
For your response posts (2), you must do the following:
Reply to at least two different classmates outside of your own initial post
thread.
In Module One, complete the two response posts by Sunday at 11:59
p.m. Eastern Time.
In Modules Two through Ten, complete the response posts by Sunday at
11:59 p.m. of your local time zone.
Demonstrate more depth and thought than simply stating “I agree” or
“You are wrong.” Guidance is provided for you in each discussion prompt.
Needs Improvement
Develops an initial post with a
point of view or idea but with
some gaps in organization and
detail (70%)
Submits initial post one day late
(70%)
Provides somewhat relevant
response posts with some
explanation and detail (70%)
Not Evident
Does not develop an initial post
with an organized point of view
or idea (0%)
Value
20
Submits initial post two or more
days late (0%)
Provides response posts that are
generic with little explanation or
detail (0%)
10
Draws logical conclusions (70%)
Does not draw logical
conclusions (0%)
30
20
Writing
(Mechanics)
Initial post and responses are
easily understood, clear, and
concise using proper citation
methods where applicable with
no errors in citations (100%)
Initial post and responses are
easily understood using proper
citation methods where
applicable with few errors in
citations (90%)
Initial post and responses are
understandable using proper
citation methods where
applicable with a number of
errors in citations (70%)
Initial post and responses are not
understandable and do not use
proper citation methods where
applicable (0%)
Total
20
100%
Response One
Large Organizations
Contains unread posts
David Bynum posted Dec 8, 2019 9:41 PM
In both the Customs and Border Patrol and in the Department of
Defense communication from the top down come in the form of
training. The upper management would create a video, usually
about 15-20 minutes in length and then hang it on the Learning
Management System (LMS). All employees would be required to
view the communication before a designated date and if the
communication wasn’t viewed the supervisors would be held
accountable for the lack of viewing. Promotions could be
interrupted and even denied based on the lack of enforcing the
viewing of the communication or simply the lack of viewing. This
is how the Federal government using training for
communication.
Thoughts???
Dave
Response 2
WOW! WK 7 ALREADY!
Contains unread posts
Maryellen Green posted Dec 9, 2019 11:19 AM
Hello Classmates,
I am an operations manager for a major shipping company.
When hired, I had to complete the training online and in the
classroom. Every few months, it’s another online video or
another classroom setting every couple of years.
The purpose of the classes and are to update you on policy
changes. The updates can range from timekeeping with
attendance to inputting paid time off. Sexual harassment and
quarterly earning report meetings are most common.
I thought the class setting was more effective because you’re
engaged with others. Depending on the information I have to
retain will dictate for me, the mode in which I learn. For
example, if it is information that bores me, or I am struggling to
get it, I will seek many forms of transmission as reading many
forums from different avenues, I watch investigative reporting or
documentaries. If I am engaged in the learning material, I can
absorb the intended lesson.
Purchase answer to see full
attachment