BCC Impact of the Environment on a Childs Upbringing Research Paper This is the submission for the final draft of your paper. Remember to review the rubric to ensure you have all of the necessary sections in your paper. A few major sections are the literature review, discussion (theoretical perspective
ACTIONS), and conclusion. I have included a video showing one method to write a research paper. This video assumes you understand your research question and have scholarly peer-reviewed journal articles.
Remember, the total length of the paper should be between 6-7 pages in total length, double-spaced, and size 12 font. Approved fonts are Arial, Times New Roman, Georgia, and Courier New. The cover page, abstract, and works cited page are included in the total page count. Send me your paper as a .pdf and I shall check for plagiarism.
You can also review the following formats:
ASA format
ACTIONS
and ASA example
ACTIONS
APA format
ACTIONS
and APA example
ACTIONS
You can also read one method to write a research paper part 1
ACTIONS
and one method to write a research paper part 2
ACTIONS
.
Lastly, I suggest reviewing the tips for writing a research paper.
One Method to Efficiently write a Research Paper (Links to an external site.)
Good luck and feel free to contact me if you have any questions!
Rubric
Final Draft of the Research Paper
Final Draft of the Research Paper
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCover pageHave a creative title, your name, institution and date. No photos, no binder required and running header is optional.
1.0 pts
Full Marks
The cover page has a title, authors name, institution and date.
0.0 pts
No Marks
The cover page is missing two or more components such as the title, authors name, institution and date.
1.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAbstractBrief description of the entire research paper. The abstract should be between 100-200 words and doubled-spaced.
4.0 pts
Full Marks
Good description of the entire paper by summarizing the previous work from the literature review, the sociological perspective for your paper and the conclusion in about 200 words.
2.0 pts
Partial Marks
Mediocre description of the entire paper by summarizing the previous work from some of the literature review, the sociological perspective for your paper and the conclusion in about 100 words.
0.0 pts
No Marks
Missing the abstract.
4.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroductionClearly describe the research question
Explain the social significance, the players and the phenomenon. The introduction should also summarize the entire paper by using the literature review as support, include the sociological perspective and a single sentence conclusion.
5.0 pts
Full Marks
Clearly describe the research question, explains the social significance, the players and the phenomenon. The literature review is used as support, include the sociological perspective and a single sentence conclusion.
3.0 pts
Partial Marks
Unclearly description of the research question, unclear social significance, the players and the phenomenon. Some of the literature review is used as support, may include the sociological perspective and a single sentence conclusion.
0.0 pts
No Marks
Missing the research question, the social significance, the players and the phenomenon. Missing the literature review is used as support, the sociological perspective and no conclusion.
5.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLiterature ReviewThe literature review summarizes previous work on the topic. The peer-reviewed journal articles are used as support to attempt to answer the research question.
20.0 pts
Full Marks
Use at least 3 peer-reviewed journal articles. Include social factors and social institutions.
14.0 pts
Majority of the Marks
Use at least 2 peer-reviewed journal articles. May include social factors and social institutions.
7.0 pts
Partial Marks
Use at least a one peer-reviewed journal article. Barely includes social factors and social institutions.
0.0 pts
No Marks
No sources in the research paper; missing social factors and social institutions.
20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDiscussion – Sociological Perspective or FrameworkExamines the research question by using at least one sociological theory to interpret the research question. Some theories are structural functionalism, conflict theory, symbolic interactionism, feminism, post modernism, etc.
10.0 pts
Full Marks
Clear analysis using a sociological perspective to explain how to interpret the data to attempt to answer the research question.
5.0 pts
Partial Marks
Unclear analysis using a sociological perspective to explain how to interpret the data to attempt to answer the research question.
0.0 pts
No Marks
Missing a sociological perspective to explain how to interpret the data to attempt to answer the research question.
10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusionThe conclusion should summarize the entire paper by using the peer-reviewed literature review as support and connecting the data to a usable sociological perspective.
5.0 pts
Full Marks
Clearly summarizes how the sources in the peer-reviewed journal articles and the theoretical interpretation attempts to answer the research question.
3.0 pts
Partial Marks
Unclear summary of how the sources in the peer-reviewed journal articles and the theoretical interpretation attempts to answer the research question.
0.0 pts
No Marks
Missing Conclusion
5.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWorks CitedList of works cited.
1.0 pts
Full Marks
List of works cited alphabetically on a separate page.
0.0 pts
No Marks
Missing works cited page.
1.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOverall PaperResearch paper is written as objective as possible by omitting personal experiences, written in third person, present tense, cogent and using collegiate discourse.
4.0 pts
Full Marks
Written as objective as possible by omitting personal experiences, written in third person, present tense, cogent and using collegiate discourse.
2.0 pts
Partial Marks
Written somewhat objective with some subjective content. There are partial personal experiences, written in third person, incongruent verb tense throughout the paper, incoherent and using incorrect discourse.
0.0 pts
No Marks
Full of subjective content, poor overall formatting and needs serious work.
4.0 pts
Total Points: 50.0