ENG147N Chamberlain College Week 3 Status of Child Vaccination Paper Please see the attach file for details
Please see the attach file for details
Please see the attach file for details
APA
one and half page
Plagiarism free.
Will provide paper details for week 1 and 2 after I choose tutor. !
ENGL147N-60265
July 2019
Account
Home
Assignments
Week 3 Assignment: Con-Positi…
Week 3 Assignment: Con-Position Proposal
Syllabus
Submit Assignment
Dashboard
Announcements
Courses
Resources
Modules
Due Monday by 1:59am
Submitting a file upload
Points 75
Groups
Files
Calendar
Grades
People
Inbox
VoiceThread
Help
Bookstore
Library Guides
Media Gallery
My Media
New Webex
Academic Support
Surveys
Required Resources
Read/review the following resources for this activity:
Textbook: Chapter 5, 13
Lesson
Link (Word doc): Con-Position Proposal Template
Minimum of 3 new articles (academic or credible online
sources different from Weeks 1 & 2 articles)
Apply the following writing resources to your posts:
Link (library article): Counterpoint: Vaccines: Caution
Advised (This is a sample con article. This link will
take you to an overview of vaccines. Click on the title
under Related Items in this overview area to access the
article.)
Link (multimedia presentation): Citing References in Text
Link (website): APA Citation and Writing
Instructions
The goal of the proposal is to create a working thesis
statement and basic research plan that considers context,
audience, purpose, and presents potential sources. A proposal
is not an outline, as it does not structure the paper. Rather, a
proposal offers direction for research needs and gives your
professor an opportunity to provide feedback before the
drafting process.
Access the Con-Position Proposal Template and complete the
six required sections:
Subject
Research Question
Claim
Research Plan
Synthesis Matrix (Add the 3 con sources.)
Reference Page
For an example proposal, refer to pages 269-270 of our
textbook.
Writing Requirements (APA format)
Length: 1 to 1.5 pages (not including title page &
reference page)
1-inch margins
Double spaced
12-point Times New Roman font
Title page & Reference Page
Reference page (3 articles)
Grading
This activity will be graded based on the Proposal Grading
Rubric.
Course Outcomes (CO): 1, 3, 4
Due Date: By 11:59 p.m. MT on Sunday
Proposal Grading Rubric – 75 pts
Criteria
Length
Thesis/Claim
Proposal
Source 1
Source 2
Source 3
Writing
APA Format
Ratings
5.0 pts
Meets length
requirement
10.0 pts
The thesis
contains
the main
claim that
can be
argued.
20.0 pts
The
proposal
exhibits
clear
direction for
supporting
the thesis
through
research.
The
proposal
considers
the
challenges
in the
research
process and
proposes
appropriate
strategies to
overcome
the
challenges.
Pts
0.0 pts
Does not meet length
requirement
8.0 pts
The thesis is
somewhat
vague in its
claim and
needs to be
defined
clearly.
6.0 pts
The
claim
cannot
be
argued.
16.0 pts
The proposal
exhibits a
fairly clear
direction for
supporting
the thesis
through
research.
The proposal
considers
the
challenges
in the
research
process but
might not
provide
effective
approaches
to overcome
the
challenges.
5.0 pts
0.0 pts
There is no
claim/thesis.
10.0 pts
12.0 pts
The
proposal
is unclear
in the
direction
for
supporting
the thesis
and does
not
consider
challenges
in the
research
process.
0.0 pts
No
effort
20.0 pts
10.0 pts
The
evidence
for each
source is
detailed
and
clearly
supports
the
points
noted.
8.0 pts
The evidence for
each source
could be
expanded
further, but the
connection to
the point is clear,
or the evidence
is detailed but
the connection
needs to be finetuned.
6.0 pts
The
evidence
for each
source is
vague or
unclear
and/or
does not
support
points
noted.
0.0 pts
No
effort
10.0 pts
The
evidence
for each
source is
detailed
and
clearly
supports
the
points
noted.
8.0 pts
The evidence for
each source
could be
expanded
further, but the
connection to
the point is clear,
or the evidence
is detailed but
the connection
needs to be finetuned.
6.0 pts
The
evidence
for each
source is
vague or
unclear
and/or
does not
support
points
noted.
0.0 pts
No
effort
10.0 pts
The
evidence
for each
source is
detailed
and
clearly
supports
the
points
noted.
8.0 pts
The evidence for
each source
could be
expanded
further, but the
connection to
the point is clear,
or the evidence
is detailed but
the connection
needs to be finetuned.
6.0 pts
The
evidence
for each
source is
vague or
unclear
and/or
does not
support
points
noted.
0.0 pts
No
effort
4.0 pts
The writing
contains
some major
errors in
grammar,
spelling,
and
punctuation,
but the
errors do
not detract
from a clear
reading of
the text.
3.0 pts
The writing
contains
several
major errors
in grammar,
spelling,
and
punctuation,
and these
errors do
detract from
a clear
reading of
the text.
0.0 pts
No
effort
5.0 pts
The writing
is free of
major
errors in
grammar,
spelling,
and
punctuation
that would
detract
from a clear
reading of
the text.
5.0 pts
All
sources
are
properly
cited.
4.0 pts
There are a
few minor
errors in the
citations.
3.0 pts
There are
some major
errors in the
citations.
10.0 pts
10.0 pts
10.0 pts
5.0 pts
0.0 pts
No
effort
5.0 pts
Total Points: 75.0
“Previous
Next#
Purchase answer to see full
attachment